Concentration-time graphs and NCA [PK / PD]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2019-02-02 17:30 (805 d 18:58 ago) – Posting: # 19849
Views: 2,035

Hi ElMaestro & Smitha,

» » 2. a. If the actual time-point is used even if the sampling deviation is within the window
» »       period, is it appropriate? Is there an impact on the PK data e.g AUC?
» I think it is common to use the nominal point for both plotting and AUC-calculation when the sample is inside the window (note: not all CROs apply windows). Otherwise use actual time for both.

I suggest to always use the actual time points (individual plots and NCA) and scheduled ones only for summary (by treatment) plots. Only once I saw a report where medians of actual time points were used. IMHO, a little bit over the top.

A note on “time allowance windows”. In most CROs the actual time point has to be recorded in the CRF anyhow. Only if a deviation from the scheduled time is larger than allowed, an explanation has to be given in the CRF (see also this post).

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

 Admin contact
21,419 posts in 4,475 threads, 1,509 registered users;
online 8 (0 registered, 8 guests [including 1 identified bots]).
Forum time: Sunday 13:29 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Nothing fails like success because you do not learn anything from it.
The only thing we ever learn from is failure.
Success only confirms our superstitions.    Kenneth E. Boulding

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz