No random calibrators (and QCs) [Bioanalytics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2019-02-02 15:49 (717 d 20:20 ago) – Posting: # 19846
Views: 1,658

Hi Bert,

» Is there any guidance for the location of calibration samples in an analytical run?

Not that I recall. I agree with ElMaestro’s comments.

» Should this be at-random?

Not a good idea – even if there is no substantial carry-over (see the EMA’s GL Section 4.2.2). If you decide to inject calibrators at the start and end of the batch do so with increasing concentrations which minimizes the relative impact of carry-over. If you have calibrators within the set of unknown samples inject a blank after. The same is applicable for QC samples as well.

» (Like it, called Junior :-) )

Not referring to your age or experience but the number of posts in the forum. :-D
Junior : <25
Regular: 25 < 100
Senior : 100 < 500
Hero   : >500

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,307 posts in 4,444 threads, 1,489 registered users;
online 14 (1 registered, 13 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: Wednesday 12:09 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Power: That which is wielded by the priesthood of
clinical trials, the statisticians, and a stick which they use
to beta their colleagues.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5