No random calibrators (and QCs) [Bioanalytics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2019-02-02 16:49 (1902 d 11:40 ago) – Posting: # 19846
Views: 2,522

Hi Bert,

❝ Is there any guidance for the location of calibration samples in an analytical run?


Not that I recall. I agree with ElMaestro’s comments.

❝ Should this be at-random?


Not a good idea – even if there is no substantial carry-over (see the EMA’s GL Section 4.2.2). If you decide to inject calibrators at the start and end of the batch do so with increasing concentrations which minimizes the relative impact of carry-over. If you have calibrators within the set of unknown samples inject a blank after. The same is applicable for QC samples as well.

❝ (Like it, called Junior :-) )


Not referring to your age or experience but the number of posts in the forum. :-D
Junior : <25
Regular: 25 < 100
Senior : 100 < 500
Hero   : >500

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,987 posts in 4,824 threads, 1,669 registered users;
86 visitors (0 registered, 86 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:30 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The only way to comprehend what mathematicians mean by Infinity
is to contemplate the extent of human stupidity.    Voltaire

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5