random calibration samples [Bioanalytics]

posted by ElMaestro  – Belgium?, 2019-01-24 17:11 (610 d 10:22 ago) – Posting: # 19805
Views: 1,782

Hello Bert,

» Is there any guidance for the location of calibration samples in an analytical run? Should this be at-random? (Like it, called Junior :-) )

There is to the best of my knowledge no guidance that deals explicitly with it.
Sometimes such samples are in the beginning of a run, and often the outcome is monitored so that if something is clearly out of whack the run can be terminated early so as not to lose PK sample material.
Some CROs with rock-solid systems intersperse them rather randomly throughout runs after a few sys suit injections. Others yet have two sets of cals per run, one in the beginning and one in the end.

All variants seem to work fine in terms of regulatory acceptance.

I could be wrong, but...

Best regards,
ElMaestro

R's base package has 274 reserved words and operators, along with 1761 functions. I can use 18 of them (about 14 of them properly). I believe this makes me the Donald Trump of programming.

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,076 posts in 4,394 threads, 1,468 registered users;
online 3 (0 registered, 3 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: Saturday 04:33 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

For every fact
there is an infinity of hypotheses.    Robert M. Pirsig

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5