Power.TOST and "3x3" or other 'higher order' designs [🇷 for BE/BA]
Dear ElMaestro!
If your question(s) is/are targeted the maintainer, email him. I think he is kindly enough to answer
.
Good question, next question.
AFAIK
it is the power of showing BE for one comparison (of two formulations whatever kind, Test or Reference) if the evaluation of the 90% CIs is done via an ANOVA with all date taken in consideration. Any multiplicity considerations are left out. That's because they depend on the combination of more than one test via and or or.
Hope this is enough explanation. If not, don't hesitate to torture me further
.
PS: Since my wife is now also retired and at home, be patient. I have not so much spare time since before
.
❝ Dear All,
❝ or perhaps mainly the powerTOST authors and maintainers
❝ thanks a lot for power.TOST and related functions. They are great.
If your question(s) is/are targeted the maintainer, email him. I think he is kindly enough to answer

❝ I have a question about e.g.
❝
❝ > power.TOST(CV=.3, theta0=.95, n=30, design="3x3")
❝ [1] 0.6973262
❝
❝ Is that the chance of showing BE for one of the comparisons, for two comparisons if we assume two are tests formulations and one if ref, or is it "all against all" which is also a common comparison?
Good question, next question.
AFAIK

Hope this is enough explanation. If not, don't hesitate to torture me further

PS: Since my wife is now also retired and at home, be patient. I have not so much spare time since before

—
Regards,
Detlew
Regards,
Detlew
Complete thread:
- Power.TOST and "3x3" ElMaestro 2019-01-08 16:29 [🇷 for BE/BA]
- Power.TOST and "3x3" or other 'higher order' designsd_labes 2019-01-09 18:47
- Power.TOST and "3x3" or other 'higher order' designs ElMaestro 2019-01-10 08:12
- Power.TOST and "3x3" or other 'higher order' designs d_labes 2019-01-10 20:15
- Power.TOST and "3x3" or other 'higher order' designs ElMaestro 2019-01-10 08:12
- Power.TOST and "3x3" or other 'higher order' designsd_labes 2019-01-09 18:47