Calculation of time above MIC [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by Aceto81 – Belgium, 2008-06-26 23:50 (6551 d 08:06 ago) – Posting: # 1976
Views: 41,345

Dear Helmut,

❝ Actually just start at the beginning of the profile and add all segments which are abobe the MIC up. If the values fall below the MIC and come up again (like in your case) do a linear interpolation. I would use rather R than WinNonlin for that purpose.


Probably I was doing something wrong, maybe sitting too long after the PC, but when I tried this approach, I wasn't even near....

But anyway, with your reply, I started over and finally it works!

Thanks for your help (again)

Ace
PS: for anyone who may find it interesting:

The R code for finding time below the threshold:
"dat" is a dataframe containing column "conc", and "time"
th = threshold
f <- function(dat, th = 0.517) {
  under <- 0
    for (i in which(dat$conc < th)) {
      if (!is.na(dat$conc[i-1])) {
        y <- dat$conc[c(i-1, i)]
        x <- dat$time[c(i-1, i)]
        slope <- coef(lm(y ~ x))[2]
        under <- under + x[2]-x[1]-(th-y[1])/slope
      }
      if (!is.na(dat$conc[i+1])) {
        y <- dat$conc[c(i, i+1)]
        x <- dat$time[c(i, i+1)]
        slope <- coef(lm(y ~ x))[2]
        under <- under + (th-y[1])/slope
      }
    }
  return(under)
}

Edit: Reformatted using BBCodes. [Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,571 registered users;
407 visitors (0 registered, 407 guests [including 26 identified bots]).
Forum time: 07:56 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I’m all in favor of the democratic principle
that one idiot is as good as one genius, but I draw the line
when someone takes the next step and concludes
that two idiots are better than one genius.    Leo Szilard

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5