90% confidence interval for R_dnm [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2019-01-07 15:17  – Posting: # 19746
Views: 6,711

Dear Shuanghe,

» » I would go with the formula of Rdnm
» » R_dnm = r^(beta1 - 1)
» ...
» This must be it!
» According to his article, Smith use the formula EXP(beta0 + beta1*ln(dose)) to calculate each mean to get ratio Rdnm. so the value is Rdnm = 0.577402 (red digit from my sas). But this is equivalent to what you wrote so if you use the full precision figure we would have obtained the same values (90% CI of (0.477381, 0.698378)). I checked with the AUC data as well, they matches what's reported in table 2.

Could you please give a detailed example for what you did here?
—
Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
20,128 posts in 4,245 threads, 1,384 registered users;
online 32 (0 registered, 32 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time (Europe/Vienna): 23:04 CET

You really don’t know what you don’t know until you write about it.
Then, everyone knows what you don’t know.    Rod Machado

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5