90% confidence interval for R_dnm [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2019-01-07 15:17 (1308 d 11:19 ago) – Posting: # 19746
Views: 15,782

Dear Shuanghe,

» » I would go with the formula of Rdnm
» » R_dnm = r^(beta1 - 1)

» ...
» This must be it!
» According to his article, Smith use the formula EXP(beta0 + beta1*ln(dose)) to calculate each mean to get ratio Rdnm. so the value is Rdnm = 0.577402 (red digit from my sas). But this is equivalent to what you wrote so if you use the full precision figure we would have obtained the same values (90% CI of (0.477381, 0.698378)). I checked with the AUC data as well, they matches what's reported in table 2.

Could you please give a detailed example for what you did here?

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,288 posts in 4,665 threads, 1,583 registered users;
online 2 (0 registered, 2 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: Monday 03:37 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Don’t compromise yourself.
You are all you’ve got.    Janis Joplin

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5