power_TOST vs. statistical power of the ANOVA [Power / Sample Size]

posted by MCELESTINO – Mexico, 2019-01-03 21:05 (753 d 21:39 ago) – Posting: # 19725
Views: 2,503

(edited by mittyri on 2019-01-05 01:33)

In the results it is also evident that the post-hoc statistical power (power_TOST) is less than 80%, this is because the estimated point is greater than 105%, considering that the sample size was estimated expecting a difference less than / equal to 5%. However, the statistical power of the ANOVA (Power_80_20) supports that the sample size used in the study was adequate, since the values ​​are greater than 90%.

This is true?


Please follow the Forum’s Policy[Mittyri]
Please don’t shout[Helmut]

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,315 posts in 4,446 threads, 1,489 registered users;
online 2 (0 registered, 2 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: Tuesday 18:45 UTC (Europe/Vienna)

Any one who considers arithmetical methods
of producing random digits is, of course,
in a state of sin.    John von Neumann

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5