power_TOST vs. statistical power of the ANOVA [Power / Sample Size]

posted by MCelestino – Mexico, 2019-01-03 22:05 (996 d 07:01 ago) – Posting: # 19725
Views: 2,891

(edited by mittyri on 2019-01-05 02:33)

In the results it is also evident that the post-hoc statistical power (power_TOST) is less than 80%, this is because the estimated point is greater than 105%, considering that the sample size was estimated expecting a difference less than / equal to 5%. However, the statistical power of the ANOVA (Power_80_20) supports that the sample size used in the study was adequate, since the values ​​are greater than 90%.

This is true?

Please follow the Forum’s Policy[Mittyri]
Please don’t shout[Helmut]

Complete thread:

 Admin contact
21,699 posts in 4,537 threads, 1,542 registered users;
online 6 (0 registered, 6 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: Sunday 06:07 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

A central lesson of science is that to understand complex issues
(or even simple ones), we must try to free our minds of dogma and
to guarantee the freedom to publish, to contradict, and to experiment.
Arguments from authority are unacceptable.    Carl Sagan

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz