power_TOST vs. statistical power of the ANOVA [Power / Sample Size]

posted by MCELESTINO – Mexico, 2019-01-03 21:05 (836 d 09:00 ago) – Posting: # 19725
Views: 2,635

(edited by mittyri on 2019-01-05 01:33)

In the results it is also evident that the post-hoc statistical power (power_TOST) is less than 80%, this is because the estimated point is greater than 105%, considering that the sample size was estimated expecting a difference less than / equal to 5%. However, the statistical power of the ANOVA (Power_80_20) supports that the sample size used in the study was adequate, since the values ​​are greater than 90%.

This is true?


Please follow the Forum’s Policy[Mittyri]
Please don’t shout[Helmut]

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,419 posts in 4,475 threads, 1,510 registered users;
online 11 (0 registered, 11 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: Monday 06:05 UTC (Europe/Vienna)

There is one certainty in drug development
and statistics that one can depend on:
the data are always late.    Scott Patterson and Byron Jones

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5