power_TOST vs. statistical power of the ANOVA [Power / Sample Size]

posted by MCELESTINO – Mexico, 2019-01-03 22:05 (838 d 17:14 ago) – Posting: # 19725
Views: 2,639

(edited by mittyri on 2019-01-05 02:33)

In the results it is also evident that the post-hoc statistical power (power_TOST) is less than 80%, this is because the estimated point is greater than 105%, considering that the sample size was estimated expecting a difference less than / equal to 5%. However, the statistical power of the ANOVA (Power_80_20) supports that the sample size used in the study was adequate, since the values ​​are greater than 90%.

This is true?


Please follow the Forum’s Policy[Mittyri]
Please don’t shout[Helmut]

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,419 posts in 4,475 threads, 1,510 registered users;
online 13 (0 registered, 13 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: Wednesday 16:20 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

In the Middles Ages the lingua franca of science was Latin.
Nowadays the language of science is bad English.    Anonymous

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5