power_TOST vs. statistical power of the ANOVA [Power / Sample Size]

posted by MCELESTINO – Mexico, 2019-01-03 22:05  – Posting: # 19725
Views: 839

(edited by mittyri on 2019-01-05 02:33)

In the results it is also evident that the post-hoc statistical power (power_TOST) is less than 80%, this is because the estimated point is greater than 105%, considering that the sample size was estimated expecting a difference less than / equal to 5%. However, the statistical power of the ANOVA (Power_80_20) supports that the sample size used in the study was adequate, since the values ​​are greater than 90%.

This is true?


Please follow the Forum’s Policy[Mittyri]
Please don’t shout[Helmut]

Complete thread:

Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum |  Admin contact
19,545 posts in 4,145 threads, 1,340 registered users;
online 12 (0 registered, 12 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time (Europe/Vienna): 10:02 CEST

Anyone who has never made a mistake
has never tried anything new.    Albert Einstein

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5