Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum 12:32 CET

Main page Policy/Terms of Use Abbreviations Latest Posts

 Log in |  Register |  Search

BE assessment regarding first time point Cmax [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by ElMaestro - Denmark, 2018-12-28 14:32  - Posting: # 19718
Views: 308

Hello Erkin,

» If these early samples were not collected, then those subjects with first point Cmax values should be dropped from the primary statistical analysis.
»
» I couldn't find the reference from EMA or FDA about dropping the subjects. I've contacted to Dr. Leon Shargel via e-mail and asked him the same question.

The whole business of dropping certain subjects, disregarding data, and getting rid of some data data while keeping other data is a discipline in which many companies, CROs and applicants are extremely skilled but not overly successful when facing regulators. If the guideline does not mention the opportunity to drop subjects data in accordance with your decision scheme then perhaps that is because regulators don't want you to drop data that way? Just thinking of this as a remote hypothetical possibility.

Funnily enough, perhaps it is just me hallucinating: Sometimes I get the impression that when CROs and Sponsors try and enter these discussions about getting rid of certain data in ways not stipulated by a protocol it seems always to be about getting rid of data that is unwanted for the purpose of showing BE, and much effort is put into keeping just the data the result in demonstration of BE. Isn't that really, really strange....?

if (3) 4

x=c("Foo", "Bar")
b=data.frame(x)
typeof(b[,1]) ##aha, integer?
b[,1]+1 ##then let me add 1



Best regards,
ElMaestro

"(...) targeted cancer therapies will benefit fewer than 2 percent of the cancer patients they’re aimed at. That reality is often lost on consumers, who are being fed a steady diet of winning anecdotes about miracle cures." New York Times (ed.), June 9, 2018.

Complete thread:

Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum |  Admin contact
19,032 posts in 4,059 threads, 1,299 registered users;
online 19 (1 registered, 18 guests [including 11 identified bots]).

When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that
something is possible, he is almost certainly right.
When he states that something is impossible,
he is very probably wrong.    Arthur C. Clarke

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5 RSS Feed