Purpose of S:N? [Bioanalytics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2018-11-09 11:26 (1045 d 16:32 ago) – Posting: # 19553
Views: 5,871

Hi ElMaestro,

» EMA: " (...) the analyte signal of the LLOQ sample should be at least 5 times the signal of a blank sample"

Oh dear, I missed that for years. Biased perception.

» So, it becomes a choice between doing something meaningful or doing something that appears compliant with the guideline :-D

Let me continue my series of methods. Number 3: A/P 10/10% but S:N 3:1. Although I have some doubts whether we can achieve such a nice A/P with such a bad S:N, let it be. I consider this one the "best" of the three. I would never ever use one of the others only cause the S:N is higher.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,691 posts in 4,534 threads, 1,541 registered users;
online 16 (0 registered, 16 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: Monday 04:58 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

They were “so intent of making everything numerical”
that they frequently missed seeing
what was there to be seen.    Barbara McClintock

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5