Purpose of S:N? [Bioanalytics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2018-11-09 12:26 (1993 d 08:54 ago) – Posting: # 19553
Views: 7,417

Hi ElMaestro,

❝ EMA: " (...) the analyte signal of the LLOQ sample should be at least 5 times the signal of a blank sample"


Oh dear, I missed that for years. Biased perception.

❝ So, it becomes a choice between doing something meaningful or doing something that appears compliant with the guideline :-D


Let me continue my series of methods. Number 3: A/P 10/10% but S:N 3:1. Although I have some doubts whether we can achieve such a nice A/P with such a bad S:N, let it be. I consider this one the "best" of the three. I would never ever use one of the others only cause the S:N is higher.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,993 posts in 4,828 threads, 1,656 registered users;
64 visitors (0 registered, 64 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: 22:21 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

So far as I can remember,
there is not one word in the Gospels
in praise of intelligence.    Bertrand Russell

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5