Purpose of S:N? [Bioanalytics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2018-11-09 12:26 (2431 d 18:08 ago) – Posting: # 19553
Views: 11,381

Hi ElMaestro,

❝ EMA: " (...) the analyte signal of the LLOQ sample should be at least 5 times the signal of a blank sample"


Oh dear, I missed that for years. Biased perception.

❝ So, it becomes a choice between doing something meaningful or doing something that appears compliant with the guideline :-D


Let me continue my series of methods. Number 3: A/P 10/10% but S:N 3:1. Although I have some doubts whether we can achieve such a nice A/P with such a bad S:N, let it be. I consider this one the "best" of the three. I would never ever use one of the others only cause the S:N is higher.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,427 posts in 4,929 threads, 1,680 registered users;
52 visitors (0 registered, 52 guests [including 14 identified bots]).
Forum time: 07:35 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

No matter what side of the argument you are on,
you always find people on your side
that you wish were on the other.    Thomas Berger

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5