and now that we are at it [Bioanalytics]

posted by nobody – 2018-11-05 17:33 (2228 d 19:10 ago) – Posting: # 19532
Views: 10,558

Hi Danmark!

As I wrote here in the past: Don't mess around tooo much with the LLOQ as this is in general not good for ones mental health. Some issues there might easily blow your mind if you start thinking about too long. Some kind of life-death boarder for your analytical method and a philosophical conundrum of a large scale.

If you have much and important information in the samples around the LLOQ find a better method or forget the whole thing. It's not worth the time you spend in this dark-grey area of our universe...

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,336 posts in 4,902 threads, 1,667 registered users;
20 visitors (0 registered, 20 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time: 12:44 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Biostatistician. One who has neither the intellect for mathematics
nor the commitment for medicine but likes to dabble in both.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5