and now that we are at it [Bioanalytics]

posted by nobody – 2018-11-05 16:33 (851 d 01:06 ago) – Posting: # 19532
Views: 5,252

Hi Danmark!

As I wrote here in the past: Don't mess around tooo much with the LLOQ as this is in general not good for ones mental health. Some issues there might easily blow your mind if you start thinking about too long. Some kind of life-death boarder for your analytical method and a philosophical conundrum of a large scale.

If you have much and important information in the samples around the LLOQ find a better method or forget the whole thing. It's not worth the time you spend in this dark-grey area of our universe...

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,368 posts in 4,462 threads, 1,494 registered users;
online 16 (0 registered, 16 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: Friday 17:39 CET (Europe/Vienna)

The statistician has no magic touch by which
he may come in at the stage of tabulation
and make something of nothing.    W. Edwards Deming

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5