Log in
RegisterFull-replicate design in two groups [General Statistics]
Dear all,
We are conducting a full replicate design study. Due to recruiting difficulties we had to split the study in two groups. It has been suggested that we should change our statistical model to model II of FDA. What risks, if any, carry on this model to our bioequivalence? Can additional factors in model artificially reduce our CV and push us out of the scaled approach to usual 125%-80% one (I am not a statistician, so my question may be statistically correct)? Should we change our usual 4-factor model?
We are conducting a full replicate design study. Due to recruiting difficulties we had to split the study in two groups. It has been suggested that we should change our statistical model to model II of FDA. What risks, if any, carry on this model to our bioequivalence? Can additional factors in model artificially reduce our CV and push us out of the scaled approach to usual 125%-80% one (I am not a statistician, so my question may be statistically correct)? Should we change our usual 4-factor model?
Complete thread:
- Full-replicate design in two groupsMikalai 2018-10-31 14:04 [General Statistics]
![[Mix]](https://static.bebac.at/img/mix.png "open in Mix view")
- Full-replicate design in two groups mittyri 2018-11-01 12:08
Ing. Helmut Schütz