An outlier? [Bioanalytics]

posted by Beholder  – Russia, 2018-10-19 09:43 (773 d 13:00 ago) – Posting: # 19476
Views: 2,729

Hi Helmut and mittyri!

» The link is not working. Can you check?

Please check now. Should work. THX to Moderator.

» Reporting concentrations to six significant digits even more. I assume that the “minimum arithmetic average Cmax” was calculated from different studies; each with a dose of 300 mg.

Looks like the value 1,479.61 ng / ml was taken from PAR of one big Indian pharmaceutical company. I’m not sure that it is average of different studies. BTW, what about seven and even eight significant digits (see PAR, pg 20)?:-D

» In the analyzed studies, the minimum value of Cmax was 60.8 ng / ml,

IMHO, that is actually the case. According to the article (Table 1), only 300 mg and 400 mg doses (not strengths) were included to the analysis. So looks like 60.8 ng / ml is an outlier due to extreme fast metabolizing?

Best regards
Beholder

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,224 posts in 4,427 threads, 1,481 registered users;
online 19 (0 registered, 19 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: Monday 21:43 CET (Europe/Vienna)

It’s difficult to work in a group
when you are omnipotent.    John de Lancie (as Q)

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5