Software validation [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2018-10-15 11:43 (1394 d 09:51 ago) – Posting: # 19443
Views: 10,895

Hi Rosy,

» I do studentized residual test with R for the outliers detection, but now my regulation prohibid to use R.

Bizarre. Consider presenting the document

R: Regulatory Compliance and Validation Issues
A Guidance Document for the Use of R in Regulated Clinical
Trial Environments

and to ask the agency why it believes (!) that commercial software (SAS, Phoenix, …) is “better” than open source. Any software has to be validated* – which is easy for base [image].

» Can i do with phoenix 7 or another statistical software like ncss.

In Phoenix you get only standardized residuals (aka internally studentized residuals). For the setup see above. In SAS both internally and externally studentized residuals are possible. Haven’t used NCSS for 15+ years – no idea.


* Examples where a commercial software screwed up:
  1. Schütz H, Labes D, Fuglsang A. Reference Datasets for 2-Treatment, 2-Sequence, 2-Period Bioequivalence Studies. AAPS J. 2014;16(6):1292–7. doi:10.1208/s12248-014-9661-0. [image] PMC Free Full text.
  2. Fuglsang A, Schütz H, Labes D. Reference Datasets for Bioequivalence Trials in a Two-Group Parallel Design. AAPS J. 2015;17(2):400–4. doi:10.1208/s12248-014-9704-6. PMID 25488055. [image] PMC Free Full text.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖 [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,289 posts in 4,666 threads, 1,585 registered users;
online 5 (0 registered, 5 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: Tuesday 21:34 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The existing scientific concepts cover always only
a very limited part of reality,
and the other part that has not yet
been understood is infinite.    Werner Heisenberg

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5