Buffon's needle [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2018-10-10 12:46 (778 d 16:26 ago) – Posting: # 19427
Views: 19,463

Hi Nastia,

somehow I missed your post. Sorry.

» I was interested how it works on real data. […] That is in 26.42% successful studies post hoc power was less than 80%. Why not in 50%? I suppose it is connected with two facts: the real number of subjects is always greater than calculated because researches include drop-outs and there exists the restricted limit of minimum of subjects in the study.

Very interesting!

» P.S.
» if (length(packages[!inst]) > 0) install.packages(packages[!inst])
» One needs "s" on the end of "package(s)"?

Yes. That’s how the function of library utils is called.
Try ?install.packages and ?install.package
Also packages[!inst] not package[!inst]. Corrected in the OP.

» cat("Results of", nsims, "simulated studies:\n")); summary(res)
» extra ")"?

THX, wrong! Corrected in the OP.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

 Admin contact
21,213 posts in 4,426 threads, 1,483 registered users;
online 12 (0 registered, 12 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: Friday 04:13 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Biostatistician. One who has neither the intellect for mathematics
nor the commitment for medicine but likes to dabble in both.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz