Buffon's needle [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2018-10-10 12:46 (1075 d 16:20 ago) – Posting: # 19427
Views: 22,577

Hi Nastia,

somehow I missed your post. Sorry.

» I was interested how it works on real data. […] That is in 26.42% successful studies post hoc power was less than 80%. Why not in 50%? I suppose it is connected with two facts: the real number of subjects is always greater than calculated because researches include drop-outs and there exists the restricted limit of minimum of subjects in the study.

Very interesting!

» P.S.
» if (length(packages[!inst]) > 0) install.packages(packages[!inst])
» One needs "s" on the end of "package(s)"?

Yes. That’s how the function of library utils is called.
Try ?install.packages and ?install.package
Also packages[!inst] not package[!inst]. Corrected in the OP.

» cat("Results of", nsims, "simulated studies:\n")); summary(res)
» extra ")"?

THX, wrong! Corrected in the OP.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,691 posts in 4,534 threads, 1,541 registered users;
online 19 (0 registered, 19 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: Monday 05:06 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

They were “so intent of making everything numerical”
that they frequently missed seeing
what was there to be seen.    Barbara McClintock

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5