Reducing matrix effects [Bioanalytics]

posted by Ohlbe – France, 2018-10-01 19:20 (2397 d 00:16 ago) – Posting: # 19356
Views: 3,644

Dear ElMaestro,

❝ is there any method published anywhere which can be realistically thought to have no matrix effect?

❝ Not just absence of mentioned effect, but truly verified absence of one and how would one go about proving it?


Define "no matrix effect". Same as concentration = 0: truly 0, or BLQ ? No matrix effect, or negligible ? Considering the analytical variability, I would consider it strictly impossible to demonstrate 0.000 matrix effect.

❝ If you had a gun pointed to your head and someone asks you to develop an LC-MS/MS method without matrix effect for, say, Duloxetine or Simvastatin where would you start?


Our Father who art in heaven...

I would start with:

  1. using matrix obtained the same way as subject samples (vacutainers, not commercial plasma collected in blood collection bags full of plasticisers)
  2. a real, proper sample cleaning (SPE or LLE, with a real development to really clean up, without too much loss in recovery. For instance, MTBE usually gives you a very good recovery of your drug... but also of quite a lot of things you'd like to get rid of)
  3. a real chromatography (not a 90 seconds run on a 30 mm column)
  4. comparing APCI and ESI. APCI is supposed to be less sensitive to matrix effects. Unfortunately, it is also less sensitive, full stop. May be problematic if a very low LLOQ is required (would not work for a number of the molecules you're working on).

And that's if I limit the definition of matrix effects to differences in detector response. You could expand the definition to include differences in recovery.

Regards
Ohlbe

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,669 registered users;
17 visitors (0 registered, 17 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: 19:37 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas.    Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5