f2 computation (for pts > 85%) - WHO GL [Dissolution / BCS / IVIVC]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2018-09-12 22:02  – Posting: # 19281
Views: 1,149

Hi jon,

» But if you do end up computing f2 using all pts? What's the harm in that? Isn't it better to conclude based on a complete profile? (meaning stop when plateau is evident. Of course this term plateau is kinda of objective.

No, actually there could be a good reason not to do that.
Consider very early and very late time points. Even if the two curves are shifted, the very early points could be close to zero dissolution, and the very late time points could close to maximum dissolution. for both. Inclusion of (many of) those points in a quantitative comparison will skew the conclusion towards similarity. You absolutely want to assure that you are capturing mainly the "steep" part of the curves. The sexy stuff in dissolution happens right where you are neither very early nor very late.

A comparison of plateau levels say nothing about product performance but just about relative maximum dissolution.

if (3) 4

x=c("Foo", "Bar")
typeof(b[,1]) ##aha, integer?
b[,1]+1 ##then let me add 1

Best regards,

“(...) targeted cancer therapies will benefit fewer than 2 percent of the cancer patients they’re aimed at. That reality is often lost on consumers, who are being fed a steady diet of winning anecdotes about miracle cures.” New York Times (ed.), June 9, 2018.

Complete thread:

 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum |  Admin contact
19,405 posts in 4,122 threads, 1,323 registered users;
online 4 (0 registered, 4 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time (Europe/Vienna): 05:06 CEST

[Those] who have an excessive faith in their theories or in their
ideas are not only poorly disposed to make discoveries, but they
also make very poor observations.    Claude Bernard

BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz