f2 computation (for pts > 85%) - WHO GL [Dissolution / BCS / IVIVC]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2018-09-12 20:35 (770 d 06:35 ago) – Posting: # 19280
Views: 3,071

Hi,
» I don't know what the USFDA GLs say though.
» I guess person who told you has a lot of explaining to do. I for one, am very interested in his explanation.

But if you do end up computing f2 using all pts? What's the harm in that? Isn't it better to conclude based on a complete profile? (meaning stop when plateau is evident. Of course this term plateau is kinda of objective.

Example:
Time: 1,2,3,4,6,8,10,12
R: 27,42,54,62,76,86,92,96
T: 34,51,64,73,87,94,98,99

If we go by the definition out there then you would cut off at 8 hours. But if you compute f2s at 8 hrs cutoff vs 12 hrs then the 8 hr cutoff f2 will fail (<50). At 8 hrs the profile isn't really complete (visually).

Thank
John

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,174 posts in 4,412 threads, 1,477 registered users;
online 10 (0 registered, 10 guests [including 1 identified bots]).
Forum time: Thursday 03:11 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

It is not so much that I have confidence in scientists being right,
but that I have so much in nonscientists being wrong.    Isaac Asimov

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5