f2 computation (for pts > 85%) - WHO GL [Dissolution / BCS / IVIVC]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2018-09-12 22:35 (2138 d 14:39 ago) – Posting: # 19280
Views: 4,915

Hi,

❝ I don't know what the USFDA GLs say though.

❝ I guess person who told you has a lot of explaining to do. I for one, am very interested in his explanation.


But if you do end up computing f2 using all pts? What's the harm in that? Isn't it better to conclude based on a complete profile? (meaning stop when plateau is evident. Of course this term plateau is kinda of objective.

Example:
Time: 1,2,3,4,6,8,10,12
R: 27,42,54,62,76,86,92,96
T: 34,51,64,73,87,94,98,99

If we go by the definition out there then you would cut off at 8 hours. But if you compute f2s at 8 hrs cutoff vs 12 hrs then the 8 hr cutoff f2 will fail (<50). At 8 hrs the profile isn't really complete (visually).

Thank
John

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,112 posts in 4,858 threads, 1,644 registered users;
71 visitors (0 registered, 71 guests [including 16 identified bots]).
Forum time: 13:15 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

It’s always fun to have your models validated,
but is way more fun to have them trashed.
Finding out you are completely wrong
is a great part of science.    G. Randall Gladstone

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5