f2 computation (for pts > 85%) - WHO GL [Dissolution / BCS / IVIVC]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2018-09-12 22:35 (1839 d 13:23 ago) – Posting: # 19280
Views: 4,323

Hi,

❝ I don't know what the USFDA GLs say though.

❝ I guess person who told you has a lot of explaining to do. I for one, am very interested in his explanation.


But if you do end up computing f2 using all pts? What's the harm in that? Isn't it better to conclude based on a complete profile? (meaning stop when plateau is evident. Of course this term plateau is kinda of objective.

Example:
Time: 1,2,3,4,6,8,10,12
R: 27,42,54,62,76,86,92,96
T: 34,51,64,73,87,94,98,99

If we go by the definition out there then you would cut off at 8 hours. But if you compute f2s at 8 hrs cutoff vs 12 hrs then the 8 hr cutoff f2 will fail (<50). At 8 hrs the profile isn't really complete (visually).

Thank
John

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,759 posts in 4,775 threads, 1,628 registered users;
19 visitors (0 registered, 19 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:59 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Whenever a theory appears to you as the only possible one,
take this as a sign that you have neither understood the theory
nor the problem which it was intended to solve.    Karl R. Popper

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5