recoveries more than 100% [Bioanalytics]

posted by Ohlbe – France, 2018-09-03 19:21 (913 d 10:45 ago) – Posting: # 19231
Views: 3,398

Dear Deepak,

» The % recovery was determined by comparing the mean peak area of 6 replicates of extracted quality control samples at High, Middle and Low concentrations against respective mean peak area of 6 replicates of un-extracted quality control samples at High, Middle and Low concentrations.

Meaning that what you observe is a mix of extraction recovery and matrix effect. If you want to see the true extraction recovery you have to compare to samples spiked post-extraction. You can combine with matrix effects experiments.

» Internal standard used was deuterated.

Makes no difference. You are looking at peak areas, not peak area ratios.

» Kindly confirm recoveries markedly higher than 100% for LQC, MQC2 and MQC1 are acceptable as per USFDA guidelines??

Did you see any limit for absolute recovery in either direction in the FDA guidance ?

» Also specify reason for higher recoveries.

Multiple. The most probable: analytical variability (your results are well within the 15 % acceptance limits for precision and accuracy). Other possibilities include ion enhancement, sample preparation, calculation errors...

Regards
Ohlbe

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,366 posts in 4,462 threads, 1,493 registered users;
online 13 (1 registered, 12 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: Friday 05:06 CET (Europe/Vienna)

The statistician has no magic touch by which
he may come in at the stage of tabulation
and make something of nothing.    W. Edwards Deming

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5