Log in
RegisterStatistical significance ≠ clinical relevance [Nonparametrics]
posted by Helmut 
– Vienna, Austria, 2018-08-20 01:49 (2514 d 05:17 ago) – Posting: # 19178
Views: 4,183
Hi anji,
Almost (see Detlew’s post).
Happens sometimes. See the last paragraph of this post.
What do you want to “justify”?
❝ In a 2*2 cross-over BE study. I want to test the Tmax used in Wilcoxon signed rank test.
Almost (see Detlew’s post).
❝ p-value less than 0.05.
Happens sometimes. See the last paragraph of this post.
❝ how to justify?
What do you want to “justify”?
—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
Helmut Schütz
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Complete thread:
- wilcoxon signed rank test & Tmax anji 2018-08-19 09:20 [Nonparametrics]
![[Mix]](https://static.bebac.at/img/mix.png "open in Mix view")
- Statistical significance ≠ clinical relevanceHelmut 2018-08-19 23:49
- Statistical significance ≠ clinical relevance anji 2018-08-20 06:19
- Statistical significance ≠ clinical relevanceHelmut 2018-08-19 23:49
Ing. Helmut Schütz