Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum 00:38 CET

Main page Policy/Terms of Use Abbreviations Latest Posts

 Log in |  Register |  Search

Use of lower bound for power of two combined TOST [Power / Sample Size]

posted by d_labes - Berlin, Germany, 2018-08-07 11:50  - Posting: # 19157
Views: 768

Dear Ben,

nice to hear from you again.

» interesting observation. Thanks for pointing this out.

You are welcome.

» ...
» » Seems to me that the authors recommend to use the lower bound as criterion for setting the targetpower, i.e. if an overall power of 0.8 is aimed for, the powers for the two metrics have to be chosen such that the lower bound >= 0.8.
» Maybe I missed it but I don't see this statement explicitly. Can you point me to the direction?

You are correct that there is no statement explicitly. The wording of the whole paragraph is not that clear understandable, to say it politely.
Maybe I read to much into it. But the example "if power for Cmax is 0.90, and for AUC 0.95, the resulting overall study power is at least 0.9 + 0.95 - 1 = 0.85" smells for me in that direction.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum |  Admin contact
18,931 posts in 4,039 threads, 1,285 registered users;
online 5 (0 registered, 5 guests [including 5 identified bots]).

A drug is not bad. A drug is a chemical compound.
The problem comes in when people who take drugs treat them
like a license to behave like an asshole.    Frank Zappa

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5 RSS Feed