BE criteria [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by rajasekharkakarla – India, 2018-08-03 11:21 (2253 d 11:07 ago) – Posting: # 19130
Views: 4,861

Dear All,

I prepared protocol for XX drug and when at the time of protocol preparation based on supportive literature i assumed it is a NTI durg and i written BE criteria as 90.00 to 111.00% CI. Later after completion of PK analysis the report writer without referring protocol he conclude BE based on 80.00 to 125.00 % CI and study has passed. but as per protocol criteria it is not meeting BE criteria i.e. 90.00 to 111.00 % CI. after rigorous literature work done and based on OGD we finally concluded the drug is not a NTI. Now i confused whether i need to go for amendment to protocol to modify BE criteria. Is it acceptable after PK and statistical analysis.

Regards,
Rajasekhar K

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,240 posts in 4,884 threads, 1,655 registered users;
67 visitors (0 registered, 67 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: 22:29 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The epistemological value of probability theory is based on the fact
that chance phenomena, considered collectively and on a grand scale,
create non-random regularity.    Andrey Kolmogorov

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5