BE criteria [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by rajasekharkakarla – India, 2018-08-03 09:21 (1477 d 00:23 ago) – Posting: # 19130
Views: 4,226

Dear All,

I prepared protocol for XX drug and when at the time of protocol preparation based on supportive literature i assumed it is a NTI durg and i written BE criteria as 90.00 to 111.00% CI. Later after completion of PK analysis the report writer without referring protocol he conclude BE based on 80.00 to 125.00 % CI and study has passed. but as per protocol criteria it is not meeting BE criteria i.e. 90.00 to 111.00 % CI. after rigorous literature work done and based on OGD we finally concluded the drug is not a NTI. Now i confused whether i need to go for amendment to protocol to modify BE criteria. Is it acceptable after PK and statistical analysis.

Rajasekhar K

Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
22,305 posts in 4,668 threads, 1,587 registered users;
online 10 (0 registered, 10 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: Friday 09:45 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Doctors are men who prescribe medicines of which they know little,
to cure diseases of which they know less,
in human beings of whom they know nothing.    Voltaire

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz