BE criteria [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by rajasekharkakarla – India, 2018-08-03 09:21 (1173 d 07:34 ago) – Posting: # 19130
Views: 4,103

Dear All,

I prepared protocol for XX drug and when at the time of protocol preparation based on supportive literature i assumed it is a NTI durg and i written BE criteria as 90.00 to 111.00% CI. Later after completion of PK analysis the report writer without referring protocol he conclude BE based on 80.00 to 125.00 % CI and study has passed. but as per protocol criteria it is not meeting BE criteria i.e. 90.00 to 111.00 % CI. after rigorous literature work done and based on OGD we finally concluded the drug is not a NTI. Now i confused whether i need to go for amendment to protocol to modify BE criteria. Is it acceptable after PK and statistical analysis.

Regards,
Rajasekhar K

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,742 posts in 4,546 threads, 1,543 registered users;
online 6 (0 registered, 6 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: Tuesday 16:56 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Sometimes the key to an answer is found
in the way you formulate the question.    David Brin

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5