BE criteria [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by rajasekharkakarla – India, 2018-08-03 09:21 (851 d 00:59 ago) – Posting: # 19130
Views: 3,899

Dear All,

I prepared protocol for XX drug and when at the time of protocol preparation based on supportive literature i assumed it is a NTI durg and i written BE criteria as 90.00 to 111.00% CI. Later after completion of PK analysis the report writer without referring protocol he conclude BE based on 80.00 to 125.00 % CI and study has passed. but as per protocol criteria it is not meeting BE criteria i.e. 90.00 to 111.00 % CI. after rigorous literature work done and based on OGD we finally concluded the drug is not a NTI. Now i confused whether i need to go for amendment to protocol to modify BE criteria. Is it acceptable after PK and statistical analysis.

Regards,
Rajasekhar K

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,224 posts in 4,427 threads, 1,481 registered users;
online 4 (0 registered, 4 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: Tuesday 09:21 CET (Europe/Vienna)

The fundamental cause of trouble in the world today is
that the stupid are cocksure
while the intelligent are full of doubt.    Bertrand Russell

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5