the results of sample size based on PowerTOST [Software]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2018-07-27 21:57 (1886 d 20:08 ago) – Posting: # 19111
Views: 5,500

(edited by Ohlbe on 2018-07-28 11:07)

❝ Hi Libaiyi,

❝ ❝ I am confused about the relationship between power and period. Are the power calculation method applied in 2*2, 3*3 and 2*4 designs the same?:-D For example, if I have the result like this of the study design as T-S-R, could I use the same method to calculate power separately for T-R and S-R? Should I get two power as the result? And, what about parallel design?

❝ ❝

❝ ❝ [image]

That table looks strange. You seem to have a pair for which the CI is not estimable?? And what about alpha 0.1? Would you be after a two-sided CI with 80% coverage (yes I am aware of the ridiculous alpha in the usual SAS code for BE, but is this table derived from one such)?

I have no idea what the intention is, it just looks strange to me, and I am sure that if I got such a table in one of my studies then I would not be answering the question I was really asking.

Edit: screwed up post deleted ;-) [Ohlbe]

Pass or fail!

Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
22,761 posts in 4,775 threads, 1,628 registered users;
16 visitors (0 registered, 16 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: 18:06 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Whenever a theory appears to you as the only possible one,
take this as a sign that you have neither understood the theory
nor the problem which it was intended to solve.    Karl R. Popper

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz