the results of sample size based on PowerTOST [Software]

posted by ElMaestro  – Belgium?, 2018-07-27 19:57 (787 d 19:48 ago) – Posting: # 19111
Views: 4,328

(edited by Ohlbe on 2018-07-28 11:07)

» Hi Libaiyi,
» » I am confused about the relationship between power and period. Are the power calculation method applied in 2*2, 3*3 and 2*4 designs the same?:-D For example, if I have the result like this of the study design as T-S-R, could I use the same method to calculate power separately for T-R and S-R? Should I get two power as the result? And, what about parallel design?
» »
» » [image]

That table looks strange. You seem to have a pair for which the CI is not estimable?? And what about alpha 0.1? Would you be after a two-sided CI with 80% coverage (yes I am aware of the ridiculous alpha in the usual SAS code for BE, but is this table derived from one such)?

I have no idea what the intention is, it just looks strange to me, and I am sure that if I got such a table in one of my studies then I would not be answering the question I was really asking.

Edit: screwed up post deleted ;-) [Ohlbe]

I could be wrong, but...

Best regards,

R's base package has 274 reserved words and operators, along with 1761 functions. I can use 18 of them (about 14 of them properly). I believe this makes me the Donald Trump of programming.

Complete thread:

 Admin contact
21,071 posts in 4,393 threads, 1,466 registered users;
online 5 (0 registered, 5 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: Tuesday 15:45 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Everybody is a Bayesian.
It’s just that some know it, and some don’t.    Trivellore Raghunathan

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz