the results of sample size based on PowerTOST [Software]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2018-07-27 21:57 (1770 d 12:18 ago) – Posting: # 19111
Views: 5,382

(edited by Ohlbe on 2018-07-28 11:07)

❝ Hi Libaiyi,

❝ ❝ I am confused about the relationship between power and period. Are the power calculation method applied in 2*2, 3*3 and 2*4 designs the same?:-D For example, if I have the result like this of the study design as T-S-R, could I use the same method to calculate power separately for T-R and S-R? Should I get two power as the result? And, what about parallel design?

❝ ❝

❝ ❝ [image]

That table looks strange. You seem to have a pair for which the CI is not estimable?? And what about alpha 0.1? Would you be after a two-sided CI with 80% coverage (yes I am aware of the ridiculous alpha in the usual SAS code for BE, but is this table derived from one such)?

I have no idea what the intention is, it just looks strange to me, and I am sure that if I got such a table in one of my studies then I would not be answering the question I was really asking.

Edit: screwed up post deleted ;-) [Ohlbe]

Pass or fail!

Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
22,616 posts in 4,740 threads, 1,611 registered users;
16 visitors (0 registered, 16 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time: 10:15 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Nerds don’t just happen to dress informally.
They do it too consistently.
Consciously or not, they dress informally
as a prophylactic measure against stupidity.    Paul Graham

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz