BQL = 0: bad rule [Software]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2018-07-16 16:02 (1534 d 16:02 ago) – Posting: # 19067
Views: 6,536

Hi Babe_Ruth,

» » Bad practice to force BQLs after tmax to zero
»
» What about for sparse sampling methods?

Sparse sampling is another cup of tea. Sounds trivial but actually isn’t.

» If there are 3 samples/time point, wouldn't we want to use 3 values for the calculation of the mean concentration? In which case imputing BQL concentrations with a value of 0 or close to 0 would be more favorable than not including the value altogether?

Some ideas:
» […] I'm interested in learning more about what I'm doing.

:-D
  Basic research is what I’m doing
when I don’t know what I’m doing.
   Wernher von Braun


» Browsing these forums in my spare time really helps me see where others are in environment of the Ba/Be world :) Searching old topics have answered most of the questions I have had, which is super helpful.

Maybe you can convince your employer to browse the forum in your payed time…



Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,391 posts in 4,685 threads, 1,595 registered users;
online 4 (0 registered, 4 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: Wednesday 08:04 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The real struggle is not between the right and the left
but between the party of the thoughtful
and the party of the jerks.    Jimmy Wales

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5