Hey wait a moment.... [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2018-06-27 13:45 (2127 d 14:53 ago) – Posting: # 18974
Views: 12,987

Hi ElMaestro,

❝ […] I think I will need to put it into reverse here:

❝ Let us say both R1 and R2 are (truly) not BE…


❝ We need that alpha correction. Sorry.


Haha, this time you answered a question not asked. ;-)

You want to get both T1 and T2 approved.

T1 = R T2 = R: ⇒ 95% CI

Clearly needs an adjustment because of the simultaneous tests and both T1 and T2 will be marketed.

You want to get either T1 or T2 approved.

T1 = R T2 = R: ⇒ 95% CI

In this case I argued for no adjustment (90% CI) in the past but nowadays I’m leaning towards an adjustment because which one will be marketed is part of a decision tree.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,993 posts in 4,828 threads, 1,657 registered users;
50 visitors (0 registered, 50 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: 04:39 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

So far as I can remember,
there is not one word in the Gospels
in praise of intelligence.    Bertrand Russell

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5