Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Someone, somebody - slightly OT [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2018-06-25 21:49 (1994 d 20:29 ago) – Posting: # 18962
Views: 5,047

Dear ElMaestro!

❝ There you have the implied/implicit assumption (in bold above) for potency correction to work. And you have my opinion why it is a dead end until someone gives me a very good reason to think otherwise.

I'm not someone, somebody ... (in German "Jemand" or "Einer", both are guilty because they don't do what my wife request from me. "Jemand oder Einer müßte mal den Müll rausbringen" ).

❝ In this regard I will retain the privilege of defining what very good means.

Thats your right acc. to the Habeas Corpus Act .

❝ I do not have a protocol for it in which I can pre-specify it .

Thats a pitty. Because in other occasions you have wording covering all the bells and whistles of that philosophical questions .

Complete thread:

• Potency correction - I still don't get it ElMaestro 2018-06-23 10:14 [Regulatives / Guidelines] 
  • Potency correction - Only in exceptional cases d_labes 2018-06-23 18:04
    • Potency correction - Only in exceptional cases ElMaestro 2018-06-23 19:55
      • Potency correction: Rather why than when Helmut 2018-06-24 00:55
        • Potency correction: Rather why than when ElMaestro 2018-06-25 10:22
          • Potency correction: Upper limit? Helmut 2018-06-25 15:34
      • Potency correction - Example d_labes 2018-06-24 14:40
  • Potency correction - EAUnion opinion mittyri 2018-06-23 22:53
  • Potency correction - example Ohlbe 2018-06-25 10:10
  • Let me answer my own question ElMaestro 2018-06-25 18:24
    • Someone, somebody - slightly OTd_labes 2018-06-25 19:49