Someone, somebody - slightly OT [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2018-06-25 19:49 (855 d 00:10 ago) – Posting: # 18962
Views: 3,625

(edited by d_labes on 2018-06-25 20:04)

Dear ElMaestro!

» There you have the implied/implicit assumption (in bold above) for potency correction to work. And you have my opinion why it is a dead end until someone gives me a very good reason to think otherwise.

I'm not someone, somebody ... (in German "Jemand" or "Einer", both are guilty because they don't do what my wife request from me. "Jemand oder Einer müßte mal den Müll rausbringen" :cool:).

» In this regard I will retain the privilege of defining what very good means.

Thats your right acc. to the Habeas Corpus Act :-D.

» I do not have a protocol for it in which I can pre-specify it :-).

Thats a pitty. Because in other occasions you have wording covering all the bells and whistles of that philosophical questions :cool:.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,179 posts in 4,414 threads, 1,474 registered users;
online 12 (0 registered, 12 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: Tuesday 19:00 CET (Europe/Vienna)

No computer has ever been designed
that is ever aware of what it’s doing;
but most of the time, we aren’t either.    Marvin Minsky

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5