BCS-based biowaivers for Class III: Syrups [Dissolution / BCS / IVIVC]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2018-06-21 12:21 (1431 d 09:23 ago) – Posting: # 18940
Views: 31,269

Γειά σου κανείς & Outlaw Torn,

» If both (T and R) are solutions (not suspensions) and exhibit no excipients influencing absorption, no need for BE (or BCS biowaiver), in my opinion.

I agree. Sometimes the API tastes terrible (e.g., bitter) and a lot of excipients are added to mask it. Mannitol is not unusual (as a sweetener and to increase viscosity). Then you would be out of the game ⇒ in vivo study.
If not, dissolution testing is possible but technically demanding.

» OT: How to get this cool little EU-flag in the "latest posts" overview on the forum? Do you have an EU-IP or how does this work?

The IP geolocation (under [image]) used in the forum is only ~98% accurate. The commercial product (99.8% accurate) would cost more than my entire domain & webspace. No way.
As of today 0.44% of posts are located in the [image]. Might be false positives. Duno.

» Not sure about the flag thing (I can't see any flags);


Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖 [image]
Helmut Schütz

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
22,091 posts in 4,630 threads, 1,566 registered users;
online 4 (0 registered, 4 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: Sunday 21:44 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Competence, like truth, beauty and contact lenses,
is in the eye of the beholder.    Laurence J. Peter

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz