BCS-based biowaivers for Class III: Syrups [Dissolution / BCS / IVIVC]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2018-06-21 10:21 (851 d 16:13 ago) – Posting: # 18940
Views: 29,261

Γειά σου κανείς & Outlaw Torn,

» If both (T and R) are solutions (not suspensions) and exhibit no excipients influencing absorption, no need for BE (or BCS biowaiver), in my opinion.

I agree. Sometimes the API tastes terrible (e.g., bitter) and a lot of excipients are added to mask it. Mannitol is not unusual (as a sweetener and to increase viscosity). Then you would be out of the game ⇒ in vivo study.
If not, dissolution testing is possible but technically demanding.

» OT: How to get this cool little EU-flag in the "latest posts" overview on the forum? Do you have an EU-IP or how does this work?

The IP geolocation (under [image]) used in the forum is only ~98% accurate. The commercial product (99.8% accurate) would cost more than my entire domain & webspace. No way.
As of today 0.44% of posts are located in the [image]. Might be false positives. Duno.


» Not sure about the flag thing (I can't see any flags);

There.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,162 posts in 4,410 threads, 1,476 registered users;
online 6 (0 registered, 6 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: Tuesday 02:34 UTC (Europe/Vienna)

In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
But, in practice, there is.    Jan L.A. van de Snepscheut

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5