FDA: antique of ’93 [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Beholder  – Russia, 2018-06-21 11:21 (1922 d 23:35 ago) – Posting: # 18936
Views: 8,473

Hi Helmut and all!

❝ Now I know where the Europeans copypasted from.


I went through the forum but still could not find the information. Ok, we know that it is "highly likely" (;-)) that the EMA took "1/10 or 100,000 rule" from FDA. But why did FDA deside to use 1/10 or 100,000 rule? Why not, for instance, "1/15 and 150,000" or 100,000 is just round number and that's all?

Thank you in advance

Best regards
Beholder

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,759 posts in 4,775 threads, 1,628 registered users;
20 visitors (0 registered, 20 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 10:56 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Whenever a theory appears to you as the only possible one,
take this as a sign that you have neither understood the theory
nor the problem which it was intended to solve.    Karl R. Popper

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5