FDA: antique of ’93 [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Beholder  – Russia, 2018-06-21 09:21 (951 d 05:13 ago) – Posting: # 18936
Views: 6,045

Hi Helmut and all!

» Now I know where the Europeans copypasted from.

I went through the forum but still could not find the information. Ok, we know that it is "highly likely" (;-)) that the EMA took "1/10 or 100,000 rule" from FDA. But why did FDA deside to use 1/10 or 100,000 rule? Why not, for instance, "1/15 and 150,000" or 100,000 is just round number and that's all?

Thank you in advance

Best regards
Beholder

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,316 posts in 4,446 threads, 1,489 registered users;
online 11 (1 registered, 10 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: Wednesday 13:35 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Nothing fails like success because you do not learn anything from it.
The only thing we ever learn from is failure.
Success only confirms our superstitions.    Kenneth E. Boulding

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5