FDA: antique of ’93 [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Beholder  – Russia, 2018-06-21 09:21 (863 d 14:11 ago) – Posting: # 18936
Views: 5,759

Hi Helmut and all!

» Now I know where the Europeans copypasted from.

I went through the forum but still could not find the information. Ok, we know that it is "highly likely" (;-)) that the EMA took "1/10 or 100,000 rule" from FDA. But why did FDA deside to use 1/10 or 100,000 rule? Why not, for instance, "1/15 and 150,000" or 100,000 is just round number and that's all?

Thank you in advance

Best regards

Complete thread:

 Admin contact
21,180 posts in 4,415 threads, 1,476 registered users;
online 6 (0 registered, 6 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: Saturday 22:33 CET (Europe/Vienna)

To know that we know what we know,
and to know that we do not know what we do not know,
that is true knowledge.    Nicolaus Copernicus

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz