No significance testing in BE [Nonparametrics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2018-06-20 11:24 (891 d 10:49 ago) – Posting: # 18928
Views: 4,469

Hi libaiyi,

no idea about SAS.

Phoenix:
Test                   T_stat    p_value 
Treatment|(SEQ1=SEQ2)    46    0.39727171


My R-code:
Expectation   : 52.5
Statistic     : 46
Exact         : Z = -0.84650388, p-value = 0.41491841
Asymptotic    : Z = -0.84650388, p-value = 0.39727171


» So, which p value should I take as the decision standard for the test?

Generally I prefer an exact test over an asymptotic one.
Significance testing is of historic interest in BE only (was abandoned decades ago). You should pre-specify an interval which you consider to be not relevant from a clinical perspective. For tmax of a pain-killer it might be just ±20 minutes but for a modified release product which is only used in steady state even a couple of hours. At the end assess whether the CI of the difference lies within the interval as usual.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,214 posts in 4,427 threads, 1,481 registered users;
online 17 (0 registered, 17 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: Friday 21:13 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Biostatistician. One who has neither the intellect for mathematics
nor the commitment for medicine but likes to dabble in both.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5