Reliable estimates? [NCA / SHAM]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2018-06-20 01:12 (1511 d 21:53 ago) – Posting: # 18925
Views: 2,297

Hi Babe_Ruth,

» I read in a PK report: "Where less than 3 quantifiable concentrations, AUC is not reported."

Bad English?

» The way I see it, if you only have two sequential concentrations above quantifiable limit, then you can generate a Tmax, but you can't be sure of the accuracy of Tmax, especially if Cmax is barely above quantitation limit of the assay used.

I know that some people report “Cmax” based on two concentrations and “AUC” on three. IMHO, that’s crap. I don’t belong to the club of guideline-addicts butI leave it you counting words like sufficient, reliable, appropriate, accurate

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖 [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,289 posts in 4,666 threads, 1,585 registered users;
online 6 (0 registered, 6 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: Tuesday 23:06 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The existing scientific concepts cover always only
a very limited part of reality,
and the other part that has not yet
been understood is infinite.    Werner Heisenberg

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5