Reliable estimates? [NCA / SHAM]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2018-06-20 03:12 (2223 d 10:17 ago) – Posting: # 18925
Views: 3,080

Hi Babe_Ruth,

❝ I read in a PK report: "Where less than 3 quantifiable concentrations, AUC is not reported."


Bad English?

❝ The way I see it, if you only have two sequential concentrations above quantifiable limit, then you can generate a Tmax, but you can't be sure of the accuracy of Tmax, especially if Cmax is barely above quantitation limit of the assay used.


I know that some people report “Cmax” based on two concentrations and “AUC” on three. IMHO, that’s crap. I don’t belong to the club of guideline-addicts butI leave it you counting words like sufficient, reliable, appropriate, accurate

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,112 posts in 4,858 threads, 1,644 registered users;
67 visitors (0 registered, 67 guests [including 17 identified bots]).
Forum time: 13:29 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

It’s always fun to have your models validated,
but is way more fun to have them trashed.
Finding out you are completely wrong
is a great part of science.    G. Randall Gladstone

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5