Exclusion of PK parameters where less than 3 quantifiable concentrations [NCA / SHAM]

posted by Babe_Ruth – USA, 2018-06-19 18:13 (992 d 08:18 ago) – Posting: # 18924
Views: 2,155

I read in a PK report: "Where less than 3 quantifiable concentrations, AUC is not reported." Is this because of imprecision and inaccuracy with calculations due to lack of data points?

Should this rule be extended to all PK parameters (such as Tmax/Cmax)? What's the harm or benefit for excluding Tmax/Cmax?

The way I see it, if you only have two sequential concentrations above quantifiable limit, then you can generate a Tmax, but you can't be sure of the accuracy of Tmax, especially if Cmax is barely above quantitation limit of the assay used.


Edit: Category changed; see also this post #1[Helmut]

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,371 posts in 4,463 threads, 1,496 registered users;
online 6 (0 registered, 6 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: Monday 01:31 CET (Europe/Vienna)

When puzzled, it never hurts to read the primary documents 
a rather simple and self-evident principle that has, nonetheless,
completely disappeared from large sectors
of the American experience.    Stephen Jay Gould

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5