Exclusion of PK parameters where less than 3 quantifiable concentrations [NCA / SHAM]

posted by Babe_Ruth – USA, 2018-06-19 20:13 (2573 d 11:13 ago) – Posting: # 18924
Views: 5,009

I read in a PK report: "Where less than 3 quantifiable concentrations, AUC is not reported." Is this because of imprecision and inaccuracy with calculations due to lack of data points?

Should this rule be extended to all PK parameters (such as Tmax/Cmax)? What's the harm or benefit for excluding Tmax/Cmax?

The way I see it, if you only have two sequential concentrations above quantifiable limit, then you can generate a Tmax, but you can't be sure of the accuracy of Tmax, especially if Cmax is barely above quantitation limit of the assay used.


Edit: Category changed; see also this post #1[Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,427 posts in 4,929 threads, 1,676 registered users;
33 visitors (0 registered, 33 guests [including 19 identified bots]).
Forum time: 07:26 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Many people tend to look at programming styles and languages like religions:
if you belong to one, you cannot belong to others.
But this analogy is another fallacy.    Niklaus Wirth

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5