Exclusion of PK parameters where less than 3 quantifiable concentrations [NCA / SHAM]

posted by Babe_Ruth – USA, 2018-06-19 18:13 (855 d 17:00 ago) – Posting: # 18924
Views: 2,000

I read in a PK report: "Where less than 3 quantifiable concentrations, AUC is not reported." Is this because of imprecision and inaccuracy with calculations due to lack of data points?

Should this rule be extended to all PK parameters (such as Tmax/Cmax)? What's the harm or benefit for excluding Tmax/Cmax?

The way I see it, if you only have two sequential concentrations above quantifiable limit, then you can generate a Tmax, but you can't be sure of the accuracy of Tmax, especially if Cmax is barely above quantitation limit of the assay used.


Edit: Category changed; see also this post #1[Helmut]

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,176 posts in 4,413 threads, 1,475 registered users;
online 16 (0 registered, 16 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: Thursday 11:14 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

It is not so much that I have confidence in scientists being right,
but that I have so much in nonscientists being wrong.    Isaac Asimov

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5