Impact of pooled variance (bias, CI) [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2018-06-13 15:02  – Posting: # 18898
Views: 7,160

Hi Irene,

» Thank you for your explanation.

You are welcome. A picture tells more than a thousand words (AUC only). ;-)

[image]


The PE and its CI of T/R are similar. The small bias is caused by the fact that the average PE of S/R and T/S (√141.09×83.12=108.29) is close to the T/R with 116.05. The other comparisons show negative biases. The CI of S/R is narrower in the pooled model and the CI of T/S is wider.
We don’t want to go there.

Cheers,
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. ☼
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum |  Admin contact
19,818 posts in 4,201 threads, 1,361 registered users;
online 8 (0 registered, 8 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time (Europe/Vienna): 18:08 CEST

If I find 10,000 ways something won’t work, I haven’t failed.
I am not discouraged, because every wrong attempt discarded
is another step forward.    Thomas Alva Edison

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5