Impact of pooled variance (bias, CI) [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2018-06-13 17:02 (1746 d 01:19 ago) – Posting: # 18898
Views: 19,633

Hi Irene,

❝ Thank you for your explanation.


You are welcome. A picture tells more than a thousand words (AUC only). ;-)

[image]


The PE and its CI of T/R are similar. The small bias is caused by the fact that the average PE of S/R and T/S (\(\sqrt{141.09\times83.12}\)) is close to the T/R with 116.05. The other comparisons show negative biases. The CI of S/R is narrower in the pooled model and the CI of T/S is wider.
We don’t want to go there.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,550 posts in 4,724 threads, 1,606 registered users;
15 visitors (0 registered, 15 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 17:21 CET (Europe/Vienna)

If there is an exception to any rule,
and if it can be proved by observation,
that rule is wrong.    Richard Feynman

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5