But what is the real problem? [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by Mikalai  – Belarus, 2018-06-07 15:47 (1445 d 06:16 ago) – Posting: # 18865
Views: 4,059

Good afternoon everyone
I just would like to clarify a bit the situation. We have a drug and do not know it CV. We take an arbitrary sample and then calculate the CV and real GMR in the first stage. In the second stage, we, if I understand correctly, should calculate post-hoc power and recalculate the sample size with the data (GMR and CV) obtained in the first stage, if bioequivalence has not been achieved in the first stage. But what to do, if we have got bad GMR(0,83), whatever CV and low power (around 30) in the first stage. In this case, as I understand, we should recruit much more subjects according to our protocol. The questions, how can we avoid slipping into "forced bioequivalence"? Or should we go straight away and recruit this large number of subjects? What should be put into the protocol?
Best regards,
Mikalai

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,091 posts in 4,630 threads, 1,566 registered users;
online 20 (0 registered, 20 guests [including 14 identified bots]).
Forum time: Sunday 22:04 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Competence, like truth, beauty and contact lenses,
is in the eye of the beholder.    Laurence J. Peter

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5