But what is the real problem? [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by Mikalai  – Belarus, 2018-06-07 15:47 (791 d 05:18 ago) – Posting: # 18865
Views: 2,886

Good afternoon everyone
I just would like to clarify a bit the situation. We have a drug and do not know it CV. We take an arbitrary sample and then calculate the CV and real GMR in the first stage. In the second stage, we, if I understand correctly, should calculate post-hoc power and recalculate the sample size with the data (GMR and CV) obtained in the first stage, if bioequivalence has not been achieved in the first stage. But what to do, if we have got bad GMR(0,83), whatever CV and low power (around 30) in the first stage. In this case, as I understand, we should recruit much more subjects according to our protocol. The questions, how can we avoid slipping into "forced bioequivalence"? Or should we go straight away and recruit this large number of subjects? What should be put into the protocol?
Best regards,
Mikalai

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
20,969 posts in 4,374 threads, 1,460 registered users;
online 19 (2 registered, 17 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: Thursday 21:06 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

It is a good morning exercise for a research scientist
to discard a pet hypothesis every day before breakfast.
It keeps him young.    Konrad Lorenz

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5