Stop estimating post hoc power! [Power / Sample Size]

posted by valivetiananth – India, 2018-06-02 10:52 (2585 d 13:26 ago) – Posting: # 18841
Views: 8,632

Thanks for your reply.

❝ ❝ We have conducted a pivotal study for Europe with 48 subjects considering ~80% power, ISCV: 23%.

❝ ❝ The study was bioequivalent and 90% CI is within 80-125 for both Cmax & AUCt.

❝ ❝ Power of Cmax and AUCt are 92% & 66% respectively.


❝ In this order? Can you give us their CVs and GMRs?


CV- Cmax: 27.731; AUCt: 22.678

GMR-Cmax: 97.76; AUCt: 87.99


Edit: Full quote removed. Please delete everything from the text of the original poster which is not necessary in understanding your answer; see also this post #5[Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,425 posts in 4,928 threads, 1,680 registered users;
29 visitors (0 registered, 29 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time: 00:19 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I think it is much more interesting to live with uncertainty
than to live with answers that might be wrong.    Richard Feynman

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5