Stop estimating post hoc power! [Power / Sample Size]

posted by valivetiananth – India, 2018-06-02 10:52 (2126 d 00:04 ago) – Posting: # 18841
Views: 7,073

Thanks for your reply.

❝ ❝ We have conducted a pivotal study for Europe with 48 subjects considering ~80% power, ISCV: 23%.

❝ ❝ The study was bioequivalent and 90% CI is within 80-125 for both Cmax & AUCt.

❝ ❝ Power of Cmax and AUCt are 92% & 66% respectively.


❝ In this order? Can you give us their CVs and GMRs?


CV- Cmax: 27.731; AUCt: 22.678

GMR-Cmax: 97.76; AUCt: 87.99


Edit: Full quote removed. Please delete everything from the text of the original poster which is not necessary in understanding your answer; see also this post #5[Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,957 posts in 4,819 threads, 1,640 registered users;
78 visitors (0 registered, 78 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 09:57 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Nothing shows a lack of mathematical education more
than an overly precise calculation.    Carl Friedrich Gauß

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5