Counterintuitive? [Design Issues]

posted by nobody – 2018-04-03 11:16 (1342 d 14:28 ago) – Posting: # 18634
Views: 5,823

Hy!

Found this Easter egg:

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11095-018-2387-4?

...only read the abstract, but the findings and Conclusion are not really intuitive to me (still in mild post-prandial coma, I must admit). Why should the most appropriate AUC metric depend on the release rate of the Test product relative to reference?

Any ideas how to wrap my head around this?

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,786 posts in 4,557 threads, 1,548 registered users;
online 19 (1 registered, 18 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: Monday 00:45 CET (Europe/Vienna)

The history of statistics is like a telephone directory:
the plot is boring, full of numbers and the cast is endless.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5