Counterintuitive? [Design Issues]

posted by nobody – 2018-04-03 13:16 (2601 d 13:54 ago) – Posting: # 18634
Views: 7,861

Hy!

Found this Easter egg:

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11095-018-2387-4?

...only read the abstract, but the findings and Conclusion are not really intuitive to me (still in mild post-prandial coma, I must admit). Why should the most appropriate AUC metric depend on the release rate of the Test product relative to reference?

Any ideas how to wrap my head around this?

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,673 registered users;
270 visitors (0 registered, 270 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time: 03:11 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Nothing shocks me. I’m a scientist.    Harrison Ford (as Indiana Jones)

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5