Counterintuitive? [Design Issues]

posted by nobody – 2018-04-03 13:16 (2008 d 03:50 ago) – Posting: # 18634
Views: 6,191


Found this Easter egg:

...only read the abstract, but the findings and Conclusion are not really intuitive to me (still in mild post-prandial coma, I must admit). Why should the most appropriate AUC metric depend on the release rate of the Test product relative to reference?

Any ideas how to wrap my head around this?

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
22,764 posts in 4,776 threads, 1,628 registered users;
16 visitors (0 registered, 16 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 17:07 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The object of statistics is information.
The objective of statistics is the understanding of information
contained in data.    Irwin and Marylees Miller

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz