Counterintuitive? [Design Issues]

posted by nobody – 2018-04-03 13:16 (2304 d 13:56 ago) – Posting: # 18634
Views: 6,856

Hy!

Found this Easter egg:

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11095-018-2387-4?

...only read the abstract, but the findings and Conclusion are not really intuitive to me (still in mild post-prandial coma, I must admit). Why should the most appropriate AUC metric depend on the release rate of the Test product relative to reference?

Any ideas how to wrap my head around this?

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,127 posts in 4,859 threads, 1,646 registered users;
75 visitors (0 registered, 75 guests [including 13 identified bots]).
Forum time: 03:13 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

No problem can stand the assault of sustained thinking.    Voltaire

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5