Counterintuitive? [Design Issues]

posted by nobody – 2018-04-03 11:16 (1597 d 07:10 ago) – Posting: # 18634
Views: 6,002

Hy!

Found this Easter egg:

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11095-018-2387-4?

...only read the abstract, but the findings and Conclusion are not really intuitive to me (still in mild post-prandial coma, I must admit). Why should the most appropriate AUC metric depend on the release rate of the Test product relative to reference?

Any ideas how to wrap my head around this?

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,305 posts in 4,668 threads, 1,587 registered users;
online 12 (2 registered, 10 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: Wednesday 18:27 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

There is no point in being precise when you don’t know
what you’re talking about.    attributed to John Tukey

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5