FDA: RSABE for NTID [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by Jay – India, 2018-04-02 08:28 (2209 d 17:29 ago) – Posting: # 18628
Views: 7,487

Thanks, John for the reply...

I would like to understand that how come the study passing in ABE within 80% to 125%, low T/R and low ISCV would not meet the BE criteria of scaled average bioequivalence.

As we generally proceed with scaled approach when the ISCV is high (more than 30%) and would not meet BE criteria with ABE approach.

Please let me know your views on the same.

Regards,
Jay

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,988 posts in 4,825 threads, 1,654 registered users;
88 visitors (0 registered, 88 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: 01:57 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The only way to comprehend what mathematicians mean by Infinity
is to contemplate the extent of human stupidity.    Voltaire

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5