Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • GMR not relevant in ABE

GMR not relevant in ABE [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut – Vienna, Austria, 2018-03-30 13:19 (2073 d 04:49 ago) – Posting: # 18624
Views: 5,094

Hi Biostats

❝ Is it mandatory to check - point estimate of the Test/Reference geometric mean ratio must fall within 80.00 - 125.00%?

See your condition #2 and the guidance

Every study should pass the scaled average bioequivalence limits and also regular unscaled bioequivalence limits of 80.00–125.00%.

What do you think where the GMR lies if a study passes ABE? It is only nice to know (unless you are concerned about this discussion). If a study fails ABE, the location of the GMR is even less relevant. Hence, the FDA does not ask for it.

—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
Helmut Schütz

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

bioequivalence criteria for NTID Biostats 2018-03-29 12:39 [Regulatives / Guidelines]
- bioequivalence criteria for NTID Helmut 2018-03-29 14:27
  - bioequivalence criteria for NTID Biostats 2018-03-30 06:25
    - GMR not relevant in ABEHelmut 2018-03-30 11:19
      - Presentation of data in report and SAS output arl_stat 2020-10-15 16:12
- bioequivalence criteria for NTID jag009 2018-03-29 17:20